The Murder of Scott Macklem: The Guilt of Temujin Kensu: Part Four: "Scott Was Very Frightened"

[00:00:00] Crack the case of your out-of-control hormones, because that's one mystery you'll thank yourself for solving. You can do just that by trying out our new wonderful sponsor, Happy Mammoth, a science-backed wellness company with a focus on gut health and hormones. When it comes to disrupting your hormonal balance, there are a ton of suspects. Skincare products, food, air. Seriously, just walking around or grabbing dinner or putting on facial products can be a problem.

[00:00:26] Happy Mammoth can help stop the havoc on your hormones. Take their two-minute quiz and get a personalized, tailor-made recommendation to help you ensure your hormones are in an optimal spot. I've been taking their Hormone Harmony supplements. These are great for women at all stages of life, but for me, they're helping my gut health and stopping these random cravings I get sometimes.

[00:00:46] For anyone dealing with menopause or perimenopause, this can help relieve those symptoms, can reduce mild mood swings and hot flashes, give you more energy, and help you sleep. They contain science-backed herbal extracts known as adaptogens, which help you adapt to all kinds of stressors. I've also been using Happy Mammoth's prebiotic collagen protein power. It's a sweet, mild vanilla bean flavor, and it's helping me keep my skin super healthy.

[00:01:14] For a limited time, you can get 15% off your entire first order at happymammoth.com. Just use the code MSHEET at checkout. That's happymammoth.com and use the code MSHEET for 15% off today. Spring's here, so that means spring cleaning for your clothes closet. Our sponsor, Quince, can help you out with that. Quince has got you covered when it comes to lightweight, breathable spring styles that will make you look fashionable without breaking the bank.

[00:01:43] Quince has so many wonderful pieces. It's hard to choose. 100% European linen shorts, dresses from $30, swimwear that's going to make you feel super fancy when you go to the beach or the pool, Italian leather platform sandals, and so much more. I'm looking at their 100% European linen utility shirt. I really like the look of it because it is a nicer, elevated version of the kind of shirts I like wearing.

[00:02:07] I might even get daring and opt for their short-sleeved linen camp or 100% linen relaxed short-sleeved shirts. It is a great place to try out new things because you know the product will be quality. All Quince items are 50% to 80% less costly than those of their competitors. Plus, you Murder Shoot listeners are going to get a great deal. Treat your closet to a little summer glow-up with Quince. Go to quince.com slash msheet for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns.

[00:02:35] That's Q-U-I-N-C-E dot com slash msheet to get free shipping and 365-day returns. Quince.com slash msheet. Content warning. This episode includes profanity as well as discussion of domestic violence, murder, and suicide. On November 5, 1986, Scott Macklem was on the verge of so many things. The 20-year-old was expecting a baby with his fiancée, Crystal. He was attending college.

[00:03:05] But he didn't get to live the life he was meant to. Instead, he was shot to death in a cowardly ambush. He was killed a little before 9 a.m. in a parking lot at St. Clair Community College in Port Huron, Michigan. About six months later, a jury found the man now known as Temujin Kenzu guilty of that crime, and he has been behind bars ever since.

[00:03:28] Over the ensuing decades, the case has become well known in some circles as a case of a supposedly wrongful conviction. The convicted man, who has been known variously as Frederick Freeman, John Lamar, and Temujin Kenzu, as well as other aliases, has long maintained that he is innocent of the crime. He and his wife, Paula Kenzu, have waged a public campaign to get him out of prison.

[00:03:54] And as we will see in later episodes, that campaign has gone to some shocking lengths. They have, for instance, not only publicly attacked a woman Kenzu raped, but they've also published her full name and telephone number. If you haven't listened to our previous episodes on the case, we recommend you go back and do so. They go into the considerable evidence against Kenzu and explain why the jury, and frankly the two of us, concluded he was guilty as charged.

[00:04:23] One question supporters of Kenzu often ask is, why is he still in prison? They feel he should be released and indicate there is no good reason for him to remain incarcerated. Are they right? Should this unrepentant serial rapist and murderer be released?

[00:04:43] We decided to explore that question, and it seemed to us that the best way to do that was to take an in-depth look on an occasion when the state seriously explored reducing Kenzu's sentence or even freeing him. That occurred back in 2010 at a public hearing before the Parole and Commutation Board. At this hearing, attorneys who worked on the case and know it better than anyone got a chance to share their views.

[00:05:09] Perhaps even more importantly, a number of people whose lives had been directly affected by Temujin Kenzu got an opportunity to offer their own perspective on whether or not he should be released. A warning. Many of the stories they tell are highly disturbing. So let's hear what they had to say. My name is Anya Kane. I'm a journalist. And I'm Kevin Greenlee. I'm an attorney. And this is The Murder Sheet.

[00:05:37] We're a true crime podcast focused on original reporting, interviews, and deep dives into murder cases. We're The Murder Sheet. And this is The Murder of Scott Macklem. The Guilt of Temujin Kenzu Part 4. Scott was very frightened.

[00:06:39] We would like to begin by repeating a couple of the notes we made at the start of our previous episodes on this case. At times, we will be presenting excerpts from testimony and affidavits, and some of those will be edited for clarity. The man now known as Temujin Kenzu has also used a variety of names and aliases throughout his life. That can get very confusing very quickly. In our episodes, we will always refer to him by the name Temujin Kenzu, which is the name he uses now.

[00:07:08] This means that if we quote someone who refers to him by another name, we will silently change that name to Temujin Kenzu. And again, this is something we are doing for clarity's sake. Let's quickly review the heart of the case against this man who now calls himself Temujin Kenzu. He is a violent rapist who terrorized Crystal and repeatedly threatened the life of her then-former boyfriend, Scott Macklem.

[00:07:34] Scott knew about the threats and spoke of them to friends and family, specifically mentioning that they came from Kenzu. Scott's car was also broken into before his death. Multiple witnesses actually placed Kenzu at the crime scene. Other witnesses who were not close enough to get a look at the man still recognized a specific coat that that man wore, and a coat of that description was later found in Kenzu's vehicle.

[00:08:00] Before the murder, Kenzu owned a shotgun that was consistent with the one used to murder Scott. After the murder, it seems to have disappeared. After the murders, Kenzu made incriminating statements in a phone call with Crystal. He made further incriminating statements to Philip Joplin. After his arrest, Kenzu also went to great lengths to alter his appearance before crucial witness lineups. He managed to get unauthorized access to a razor so he could shave before the witnesses could even get a look at him.

[00:08:30] This meant he would look different than he had on the morning of the murder. Again, this was not a one-off incident. This happened at least twice. It is clearly the action of a guilty man who was trying to manipulate the process to benefit himself. And that is not where Kenzu's crude attempts to control the process ended. He also contacted numerous people and tried to manipulate them into giving him false alibis. It didn't work on some people.

[00:08:57] They saw through Kenzu and testified to those bizarre interactions in court. But it did work on others. One person could not remember when he saw Kenzu until Kenzu called and manipulated him. That person became Kenzu's number one alibi witness and even went on to call others to help bolster the accused murderer's story. For some reason, Kenzu's attempts to tamper with the crucial witnesses has not gotten much attention. But it was incredibly important to the jury.

[00:09:27] One juror specifically cited it as a reason why they chose to reject Kenzu's alibi witnesses. This is part of the reason why they reached the same verdict we did. Temujin Kenzu is guilty. He murdered Scott Macklem. Our saying that Kenzu is guilty puts us on the outer fringe of the true crime community. But it also places us squarely in agreement with the many courts who have reviewed this case and found no reason to doubt the jury's verdict.

[00:09:55] Now, we are not going to mention today the last names of the women who have been victimized by Kenzu. One final note, this hearing took place in 2010. At that time, Kenzu was married to a woman named Amiko Kenzu. She has since passed away. Kenzu has since married a woman named Paula. The hearing before the Parole and Commutation Board, in essence, was an opportunity for interested and relevant people to come and make statements about their experience with the case to a board,

[00:10:25] which would then make a recommendation as to whether or not Kenzu's sentence should be reduced. Kenzu's hearing ran two days, and the resulting transcript is an eye-popping 1,316 pages. We're going to break up our coverage of this hearing into two episodes. But obviously, even us doing that does not give us the time to present more than a very small portion of what transpired.

[00:10:53] So we're going to try to pick the moments we felt were most relevant, and we're also going to try to focus on those areas that we feel have not received as much attention as they should. The process started with Scott Rothermel, an assistant attorney general in Michigan, having a rather lengthy and at times contentious back and forth with Kenzu. We want to highlight only a couple of very small parts of that. This first excerpt does not include Kenzu at all,

[00:11:19] and is just Mr. Rothermel reading the details of a criminal offense Kenzu committed before the murder. At the time, Kenzu and his wife were estranged. To be clear, this wife was not Amiko or Paula, but a previous wife. She was seeing another man, a person named Charles. Kevin will read the details of what transpired between those people on a summer's day in 1985. Okay, it says, well, let me just give you this.

[00:11:45] And this is the investigator's version of the offense from the police report. It states that on July 25th, 1985, the complainant, Charles, indicated that at approximately 11 a.m., Kenzu followed him and Kenzu's wife down 9 Mile to where the couple dropped off the wife's sister for work. The complainant states that he then drove down Green Mile, Greenfield rather, to 10 Mile.

[00:12:11] He headed east and the subject, Temujin Kenzu, was following them. Charles slowed down to look at the defendant, Temujin Kenzu. The defendant began yelling, and the complainant sped up and pulled in front of him. Charles got out of his car and started walking towards the back when the defendant, Temujin Kenzu, jumped out of his vehicle with a martial-set hatchet and threatened him.

[00:12:37] He was poking at Charles and swinging the hatchet, saying he was, quote, dead. He challenged him to war and said it was not over. He then told his estranged wife that she had better do exactly what he said. Kenzu was very demanding. He got her upset, and, according to Charles, she did not know what to do. Charles got back in the car and left. Defendant Kenzu followed the subjects for a few miles and then turned off.

[00:13:07] The complaint that Charles and Kenzu's estranged wife went home and called a lawyer and police. We wanted to highlight that for a couple of reasons. To us, it shows that what Kenzu did to Scott Macklem was not an isolated incident. This is another instance of Kenzu being confronted with a situation where a woman he wants prefers the company of another man. And, just as he would with Crystal and Scott, Kenzu responds with threats and violence.

[00:13:35] The primary difference is that in the time between this incident and the murder, Kenzu and his violence would escalate. Scott would not have the ability to get into his car and drive away. It is also true to say that Charles backed off from Kenzu, and as far as we know, Scott did not. There were so many witnesses at this hearing, and we want to give them a voice, so we are not going to spend much more time on the part of the hearing where Kenzu was going back and forth with Rothermel.

[00:14:04] But I wanted to highlight one more section. This is an exchange between Rothermel and Kenzu. Kevin will read Rothermel's words, and I will read Kenzu's. You've claimed a couple of different times that Crystal was the actual murderer. You recall this, correct? I did believe that initially, sir. Yes. Okay, so there's a letter to your attorney from June 24th, 1987. You claim that Crystal was the murderer.

[00:14:31] And also, let me see, you wrote a letter to your daughters back in 2002, and you insinuated that Crystal was a possible murderer. Correct. So let's stop there. The idea that Crystal may have been the one to kill Scott is not just shockingly stupid and wrongheaded. It is also downright offensive. We say that because Kenzu clearly uses it as a weapon.

[00:14:58] It is not enough for him that he repeatedly raped and abused Crystal. It is not enough for him that he murdered the father of her child. He wants to punish her even more. One of the ways he does that is by trying to attack her character, to try to make people have doubts about her and wonder if she is a murderer. It didn't work.

[00:15:24] No one should take seriously the idea that a woman who was physically and sexually abused by a monster will suddenly turn and abruptly murder the man who had saved her from that, the man she was building a new life with. It's ridiculous. But it's also typical of Temujin Kinsu. We will go into all of this in more detail in a future episode, but over the decades, he has posited a series of downright ridiculous conspiracy theories

[00:15:50] about different people who he believes at different times to have been responsible for the murder. He has also repeatedly attacked the character and integrity of everyone who disagrees with him, especially people in the legal community who were involved in the investigation and prosecution of his case. He wants the world to believe that they were all out to get him and they were all corrupt. None of that is true. These days, we're all vulnerable to surveillance and data breaches.

[00:16:21] Delete.me is a service that lets you remove your personal data online, and it's easy, quick, and safe. We all know that it's easier than ever to find someone's address, phone number, and close relatives online. That is not good when there's plenty of bad actors who want that information. Delete.me can help you protect yourself by removing your information from hundreds of data-brokered websites. That prevents the bad guys from getting a hold of your sensitive information.

[00:16:49] We love Delete.me. We've used it long before this company even sponsored us. The reason we love it is because it works. And to be frank, we've run into our fair share of weirdness online. That includes all manner of threats, a few stalkers, and one person who even said they wanted to harm Kevin so that they could marry me. So fun. The thing is, when you run a true crime podcast and you talk about some of these cases, you just attract the attention of some people who are kind of unhinged. And seriously, that can be pretty scary.

[00:17:17] And we're not alone in this kind of situation. Identity theft, doxing, harassment, stalking, these things can happen to anyone. Take control of your data and keep your private life private by signing up for Delete.me, now at a special discount for our listeners. Today, get 20% off your Delete.me plan by texting SHEET to 64000. The only way to get 20% off is to text SHEET to 64000.

[00:17:47] That's SHEET to 64000. Message and data rates may apply. If you're like us, you sometimes struggle to lose weight or maintain a healthy weight. Well, that's where Lean comes in. This is not a weight loss injection. It is a weight loss supplement formulated by doctors. A doctor and a university researcher teamed up to create Lean and target the same goals as a GLP-1.

[00:18:13] Lean's ingredients are shown to lower blood sugar, reduce appetite, and burn fat. This is for people who are serious about weight loss and who are frustrated that they aren't getting anywhere. I myself have started taking Lean supplements. It's really helped curb my appetite so far. Just listen to these testimonials. Patty S. said, I finally found a weight loss product that works. I wanted to lose 20 pounds and Lean really curbs my appetite. Lori M. wrote, I've struggled to get weight off and Lean has been a lifesaver.

[00:18:42] I've been losing a couple pounds a week or more. And Kelly F. said, Amazing. I immediately noticed an energy boost and a healthy weight loss in weight. I would promote this product to anyone. And Murder Sheet listeners are in luck. Let's get you started with 20% off. Just use code MSheet20 at TakeLean.com. That's code MSheet20 at TakeLean.com. Again, TakeLean.com.

[00:19:09] T-A-K-E-L-E-A-N.com. Results vary. These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease and is not a substitute for care from a healthcare provider. The next speaker is going to touch on some of that. She is Mona Armstrong, and she was then a senior assistant prosecuting attorney at the St. Clair County Prosecutor's Office. Of course, St. Clair County is where Scott was murdered.

[00:19:39] Ms. Armstrong is now a judge. Anya will read some of what she had to say. Temujin Kenzu is very earnest, and he has been for decades about his innocence. He has always maintained his innocence. And as you saw him today, he was very convincing. In a lot of ways, in which he earnestly addressed this board and asked you to consider things from the perspective that he portrayed the case. I think it was also clear from some of the questions of the board members that when you scratch the surface a little bit

[00:20:07] of those claims of conspiracy, of collusion, that you find that there is really no validity to the accusations that Mr. Kenzu has made and to the efforts that he's undertaken to question the validity of that conviction. I want to stop there because Judge Armstrong just made an excellent point. A lot of the issues Kenzu and his supporters have raised over the years sound very compelling. And when those claims get repeated in the media, then of course,

[00:20:36] people are going to come to the conclusion that the man must be innocent. That is why it is so crucial to really examine those claims very closely. That's why our legal system is set up the way it is. We arrange things so that one side gets to make claims and then the other side gets to take a good look at them to ask critical questions to try to get to the truth. That is why we have things like cross-examination. When you take that kind of close look at Kenzu's claims,

[00:21:03] you find, frankly, that they fall apart. That is not just our opinion. It's also the opinion of the many courts and legal bodies who have reviewed this case carefully over the years. No matter how good Kenzu's claims might look at first impression, they fall apart when they are challenged. And that is because he is a guilty man. So let's get back to more of what Judge Armstrong had to say. And once again, Anya will read her words.

[00:21:33] I would just briefly want to touch upon the filing that we received late Friday, which was a response filed by the prisoner's wife to our initial brief that was submitted to the board on August 2nd. I would submit that I believe that this is indicative of the approach that the prisoner and his supporters have taken throughout this process. It merely rehashes and reasserts those claims that have already been made, already been reviewed, and already been rejected.

[00:22:02] And the mere fact that the prisoner and his supporters have attempted to malign the character of so many people, and now, by virtue of that, they've attacked St. Clair County prosecutor Mr. Wendling and my office, again in that letter, the cover letter. The prisoner's wife alleges that members of my office have been convicted of numerous crimes, including prostitution, gambling, drug dealing, all sorts of things. But the bottom line is, I think it's indicative of precisely what the boards picked up on here today,

[00:22:32] which is, if you don't agree with Mr. Kenzu, if you don't buy into this story that he's tried to pass off, you are an enemy. You are motivated by something, quite honestly, that can only be characterized as evil. And your purpose is to bring him down personally. And that's now been directed toward my office under the current administration. Let's stop there again just for a moment because we want to highlight what Judge Armstrong is saying there.

[00:23:01] Basically, if you do not agree with Temujin Kenzu, you are the enemy. And he regards you in the harshest possible terms. You're not just wrong or misinformed. You are evil and corrupt. But I'm going to suggest to you now that this is how Kenzu has always viewed the world. He now wants to knock down and destroy the reputations of people who see his case differently than he does. When he was a free man,

[00:23:29] he wanted to terrify and intimidate women like Crystal who dared to have a will of their own. In both cases, the impulse is the same. He sees people as tools designed to serve him personally. When they don't do that, they need to be punished. We would also be remiss not to note that this is a tactic identical to one deployed by modern-day true crime conspiracists. For those of you who followed our Delphi murders coverage, you know we saw this sort of thing there firsthand.

[00:23:58] Baseless allegations of some grand conspiratorial cover-up. It's not an argument of strength in our view. Massive claims of corruptions ought to be backed up with massive amounts of evidence of said corruption. Otherwise, they sound empty and like nothing more than sour grapes. So let's get back to Judge Armstrong and once again, Anya is going to read her words. They have tried to suggest that there were other killers. They've alleged that Crystal was the murderer in this case.

[00:24:28] It's been alleged that eyewitness Renee Gobine is the murderer in this case. And as recently as in 2007, the Metro Times ran an article in which the prisoner alleged that, again, he had another lead on the real killer based upon a conversation he had in prison with someone else that he took some notes about, someone who could tell him details about the real killer of Scott Macklem. And that article ran on August 8th, 2007. So this has been a recurrent theme to challenge the validity of the conviction

[00:24:58] that after all those repeated attempts, after attempt, after attempt, they have not been successful. And the reason they have not been successful is because there is no validity and no merit to the prisoner's claim that he is innocent. Again, we feel like Judge Armstrong made a terrific point there. Team Kinzu has tried repeatedly to point the finger at everyone other than Temujin Kinzu. And the reason all of those efforts fail as they must fail is because in fact,

[00:25:28] the guilty man is Temujin Kinzu. Let's move on and hear what Judge Armstrong had to say about the plane. This, of course, pertains to the fact that a rebuttal witness for the prosecution testified that it would have been theoretically possible for Kinzu to have flown from Escanaba to Port Huron to commit the murder. That means, of course, that the witness testified only very briefly about the plane at the very end of the trial. Over the years, Team Kinzu has vastly overstated the importance of that testimony.

[00:25:58] But let's hear what Judge Armstrong has to say about it. And once again, Anya will read her words. Quite honestly, at first blush, when someone says, hey, it's the prosecutor's theory that this prisoner took a plane, came down to Port Huron, Michigan, killed someone, and took a plane back up to Escanaba, your first instinct is to say, well, that doesn't sound like it could happen. That testimony regarding the plane originated in the statement that the prisoner Temujin Kinzu made in the phone call that was testified to

[00:26:27] by then-Sgt. Dave Hall. So this was not an idea that was born with the prosecutor at that time. Further, I don't think you have to be a trial lawyer to know that you're not going to save that for rebuttal. If this is the only viable explanation you can give the jury for how the prisoner is physically capable of committing this crime, you don't hold that close to the vest, and you don't stick it in your pocket. You tell that jury about it in opening. It's one of the first things that you're going to talk about.

[00:26:56] It's going to be one of the last things that you talk about. And, as has already been pointed out, Prosecutor Cleland didn't mention it in his opening. It was not a part of his case-in-chief. He mentioned it in rebuttal following Mr. Dean's closing argument. And it was a rebuttal witness that he offered to rebut the suggestion that it would have been impossible. And that was the suggestion. It would have been impossible. It was not impossible. But clearly, the main thrust of Prosecutor Cleland's argument at the time

[00:27:25] was that the alibi witnesses couldn't substantiate or establish the prisoner's location at the time of the murder. And quite honestly, that's why, when people file an alibi notice, we don't just dismiss cases. We try a lot of cases where defendants bring alibi witnesses. And the reason for that is sometimes alibi witnesses are mistaken. Sometimes they lie. Sometimes they've been influenced by the defendant to believe something about a certain time and place when in fact they are mistaken. And what we do in those circumstances

[00:27:54] are we test the memory, we test the credibility through cross-examination, and ultimately the jury, which is the best body to make the fact-finding decision about the credibility of those witnesses, makes the judgment and makes the assessment of whether or not they are to be believed. The fact that he presented alibi witnesses was not a defense in this case because the jury did not believe that they provided an alibi, and that's the extent of that testimony. And furthermore, it is conceivable and it was possible

[00:28:24] for him to have taken the plane, but that clearly was not the crux and not the focus of Prosecutor Cleland's argument. We believe that summarizes it wonderfully., the final analysis, the jury just did not believe what the alibi witnesses had to say. And as Judge Armstrong pointed out, every workday across the country, there is a trial somewhere in which someone is presenting an alibi witness. No one on the other side ever accepts

[00:28:54] those witnesses uncritically. Those witnesses are examined, and sometimes, like here, those witnesses are found wanting. Having an alibi witness does not guarantee you an acquittal if those witnesses do not have credibility. And, because of Kenzu's campaign of manipulation and perhaps other factors, the alibi witnesses in this case simply did not have credibility. Let's move on. Judge Armstrong

[00:29:24] goes on to address some of the other arguments made by Team Kenzu. Again, a lot of this goes back to suggestions that Crystal did not tell the truth on the stand. Team Kenzu suggests she exaggerated her relationship with Kenzu, that he didn't really spend much time with her. They suggest that if Scott Macklem was getting threats, then those threats may have been coming from someone completely unrelated to Kenzu. Some have even gone as far to suggest that perhaps Crystal had another mysterious violent ex-boyfriend and that who knows,

[00:29:53] maybe it was him that was threatening Scott. Let's see what Judge Armstrong has to say about that. Once again, her words are going to be read by Anya Kane. Jerry Keller established that Scott Macklem, in fact, did know the prisoner Temujin Kenzu. Scott Macklem had recently, prior to his murder, shared with Mr. Keller his fear of this particular prisoner. And in fact, I can indicate to the board that I actually spoke with Mr. Keller myself personally about a month or so ago

[00:30:23] and he affirmed for me that, in fact, that is true. Mr. Macklem did know the prisoner, Temujin Kenzu, was afraid of the prisoner and shared that with him. And it's my understanding he's going to be sending a letter to the board which reflects as such. So I would ask the board to please consider that information when it is provided to you. Not only did Mr. Keller substantiate that relationship, but Heidi Bartel established that relationship. And again, there was an effort and has been an effort throughout the course of the history of this case

[00:30:53] to place everything on Crystal's shoulders and say, well, the only person that can substantiate this theory of the prosecution is Crystal. And again, that's not borne out by the transcript and the evidence itself. In fact, Heidi Bartel, who was a clerk, she was about 21 years old, at the same store that Crystal worked, testified at that trial that the prisoner repeatedly came into that store. And again, there's been an effort today to try to minimize or mischaracterize that relationship with Crystal, try and make it seem less significant than it was

[00:31:22] when in fact, Heidi Bartel would indicate he came in almost every day, that he would stay for hours and that there were occasions in which he was in the store when Scott Macklem was in the store and that there was at least one occasion when there was this situation where they're staring each other down. So again, this does not, this case does not rest on the shoulders of Crystal, who quite honestly showed a lot of bravery and a lot of courage in stepping up and testifying as a witness the abuse that she suffered at the hands of the prisoner Temujin Kenzu.

[00:31:52] But in fact, that testimony was corroborated by other witnesses that were presented at trial. Let's talk about another aspect of Crystal's testimony. You will remember that she told a number of stories about different things Kenzu did or told her. For instance, she talked about Kenzu having a listening device that enabled him to listen to conversations at a distance. Team Kenzu has tried to argue that claims like that are ridiculous, that such a device did not even exist

[00:32:21] in 1986. Let's hear Judge Armstrong's comments on that and again, her words will be read by Anya. The prisoner Temujin Kenzu suggested to the board today that Crystal's testimony regarding the listening device is just ludicrous. Nothing existed at the time and therefore she must be lying. Well, Tom Ford testified at the trial that he saw the prisoner pretending to use a listening device. Now, whether or not he actually had a listening device is irrelevant. The fact remains that he wanted people to think that he had

[00:32:51] that capability. He wanted specifically Crystal to think that he had that capability. He wanted Crystal to believe that he belonged to that organization and that he was able to call someone up and order a contract out on someone just by virtue of a phone call. And the reason that he wanted her to believe all that is because he is abusive to her, was abusive to her, and manipulative of her. And this is about manipulation and control. And we know a lot more about domestic violence today than we knew

[00:33:21] back in 1986. And this is textbook abuse and domestic violence against the victim in this case and against multiple victims in this case. When you talk about domestic violence, it is important to recall that the abuser's romantic partner is often not the only target. With that in mind, let's hear what Judge Armstrong had to say about Kenzu's relationship with one of his daughters, who we will today refer to as Elle. Again, I'm going to read what the judge

[00:33:50] had to say. I think what's perhaps most shocking is the manner in which prisoner Temujin Kenzu referred to his daughter, Elle, who shared that letter with the board regarding her extreme and objective fear of her father based upon not what she was told about him, not what she learned from her mother. This was an individual who took it upon herself to try to establish a relationship with her father. She had not met him prior to his imprisonment, and she took it upon herself to establish that relationship. And it was by virtue of the prisoner's own conduct

[00:34:20] and conversations with his daughter that she is in fear to the degree that she has shared with this board. And the prisoner here today refers to her as a junkie, a drunk, a prostitute, a horrible person. And I think that, that again, is indicative of the measures to which he's willing to go to literally just attack anyone who would take a position contrary to what he deems is in his best interest. This is a girl who's extremely scared of her father, and that's based upon the way she was treated including an assault that occurred to her

[00:34:50] during a visitation. You heard that correctly. Kimogen Kinzu actually assaulted his own daughter during one of her visits to him in prison. We will hear more details about that incident in our next episode on this case where we will include the statement that Elle gave to the board. Now, Judge Armstrong returned to the subject of that occasion in Oakland County when Kinzu threatened the life of a man who was with

[00:35:19] his estranged wife. Anya, we'll read the judge's words. We know what we know about his prior history, that he has a history of theft and violent assaults, the felonious assault in Oakland County that is strikingly similar to the facts of this case. In both situations, the prisoner stalked and confronted a victim in a vehicle and assaulted him with a weapon. And despite his effort to minimize that incident now, it's very clear that's precisely what happened. He claimed today, well, why would I kill Scott Macklem?

[00:35:48] I had broken up. In fact, I think the word he used repeatedly was he had dumped Crystal. But the bottom line is he was not with his estranged wife at the time that he assaulted Charles. So for whatever reason, even though estranged from his wife, this assault upon her, the individual that she was then having a relationship with, is strikingly similar to the facts of our case, which involves Scott Macklem, who was stalked and confronted in a vehicle with a weapon. And just a slight aside to that issue,

[00:36:18] the prisoner asserted today, he's asserted in his pleadings, that if I would have killed somebody or if I would have had done this, I would have killed somebody else. I would have killed somebody else I had a grudge with. And he talked about, why didn't I kill Charles? Why didn't I kill? And I think he named other boyfriends of the girls that he's talking about. And that's the don't rob every bank argument that I see as a prosecutor. When we are prosecuting someone for robbing a bank, they really can't come in and argue that they didn't rob every other bank

[00:36:47] on the way to that one. The bottom line is that this particular scenario presented the opportunity for this prisoner to commit this crime. It is not a coincidence that this happened shortly after Crystal became engaged to Scott Macklem. It's not a coincidence that it happened shortly after Crystal made public her pregnancy. And whether or not the prisoner thought it might have been his child or for whatever reason, we can't speculate as to why this or on this date he decided to kill Scott Macklem. The fact remains that he did.

[00:37:18] Not only did Temujin Kinzu kill Scott, but Kinzu also made his victim's parents feel threatened. Let's hear Anya read what Judge Armstrong had to say about that. And the people that he contacted directly were the Macklems, Scott Macklem's parents. And quite honestly, you might disregard the fact that he contacted them once and say, OK, that's just a particularly insensitive prisoner who doesn't take into account how the parents of a murdered victim

[00:37:47] might feel getting a letter from the person who murdered their son. But the problem with that is he sent a letter. I believe the first one was in 1998. Then he sent another one. He sent another one in 2000. And he even references in the 2000 letter that the fact that he knew they felt threatened over the first letter. He never overtly threatens them. He didn't overtly threaten them in the first letter. He did make a statement that I would submit someone in their position would find threatening. He suggested that he wouldn't need

[00:38:17] a weapon to commit murder, which quite honestly, again, if you're in their shoes, I think you would read that to be a problematic statement at the very least. But for whatever reason, whether you think rightfully so or not, they felt threatened receiving that letter and they sought help and it was turned over to the Department of Corrections. And the prisoner referenced that in his 2000 letter in saying that, you know, you're probably going to feel threatened by this again. But he sent them another letter. That clearly shows that Temujin Kinzu does not care

[00:38:47] if his words and actions cause further pain and trauma to the families of his victim. As your presentation near to close, Judge Armstrong read a couple of very interesting letters. We are going to share excerpts from each. The first letter is from a woman named Michelle. This is a woman who is living with Kinzu at the time of the murder. Anya will now read from Michelle's letter. With one mention of contact with anyone associated with Temujin,

[00:39:17] I can instantly feel physically sick. One of the times I can remember that were major were outside of the hotel rooms. Temujin and I had an altercation. I don't remember what caused it, but I was left with three scars from just that one time. I have a scar from a throwing knife in my right shoulder. My left pinky finger has an almost two-inch scar from being broken from a kick, which left the bone protruding from my finger.

[00:39:46] And my earlobe was split in half as well. I've never gone to the hospital during each of these, any of these episodes, as he would always take me in and dress my wounds. We stayed in a hotel in Flint when I worked at the Watersheet Pavilion as a security guard. The entire building was glass. And one night when he was supposed to pick me up, he drove by and saw me talking with a male employee at the fudge shop. When we got home, he used hardwood nunchaku

[00:40:15] to strike my body and head. I had to tell the boss at the security office that I fell down 25 stairs. When I lived in Escanaba and was pregnant, he was on a date with Tom and two other girls. I could not see myself and my unborn child living the life that I was living and entertain the idea of suicide. This type of thought is not me and never has been in the past nor has it been since. I just couldn't see a way out. He had firearms in the house,

[00:40:45] so I wrote a letter and sat in the room with the firearm and couldn't do it. He came home soon after that and when he found out he struck me repeatedly with a shanai or bamboo sword on every inch of my body except my stomach. I was roughly seven months pregnant at the time. Tom had left to take the girls home. I'm not sure if he actually heard any of it or was already gone, but he took the motorcycle and I, and left Temujin and went back to his dad's house, I think.

[00:41:14] We did not see him after that. That was the end of the letter from Michelle. Her story speaks for itself, but we do want to make sure you caught an important detail. She made clear that there were firearms in the residence she shared with Temujin Kinsu.

[00:41:44] He has tried repeatedly over the years to suggest that there were no firearms in that residence. We believe he was lying and that Michelle is telling the truth. Next, Judge Armstrong read a letter from Robert Cleland. He was the prosecutor in Kinsu's trial and later became a district court judge. He has not made many comments about the case since, so we feel it is especially interesting and noteworthy to hear what he has to say in his letter. Kevin will read his words.

[00:42:14] Scott Macklem's death was plainly an unprovoked and premeditated murder by an actor who lay in wait and then fled the scene. Because the petitioner asserted alibi, the only real question to be litigated was identity. Proof of motive can support identity in the victim's fiance, Crystal, provided extensive detailed testimony about the petitioner's relationship to her and his possible motive to commit murder, including a dozen

[00:42:44] or so threats to harm Scott Macklem during mid-1986 and the way in which the petitioner had tried and in some measure succeeded, to manipulate her life and control her activities during the time. Crystal said the petitioner had beaten and raped her, a claim that was corroborated by another witness. She had seen the petitioner brandishing a shotgun, which she said he claimed to always keep at hand. Evidence of the acts the petitioner

[00:43:13] perpetrated, described by Crystal, were not character assassination, as the petitioner now asserts, but were Rule 404B evidence designed to eliminate motive tending to prove identity. In that section, Judge Cleland basically explains some of the key facts in the case. Kenzu's treatment of Crystal came into the trial because it explained his motive. It was crucial information for the jury to be able to consider. I also think it's important to stress, as Judge Cleland

[00:43:43] did here, that Crystal saw Kenzu with a shotgun, Scott was killed with a shotgun, Kenzu's shotgun was never found. What happened to it? Let's get back to Judge Cleland's words. Again, Kevin will read from what the judge wrote. Several alibi witnesses and some supporting documents were well investigated and fairly presented to the jury by defense attorney David Dean, who was an assertive and experienced criminal practitioner and who performed admirably, in my opinion, in this trial. Some of the alibi

[00:44:12] witnesses, though, had made statements to our investigators earlier that were not consistent with trial testimony or were less certain earlier than they were months later at trial. There was also dramatic testimony that some potential witnesses had been unsuccessfully prodded by the petitioner to, remember, alibi supporting events that did not actually occur or that occurred on a different date. This called into question the testimony

[00:44:42] of all alibi witnesses. In that part of the letter, Cleland reminds us of how Kenzu interfered with and manipulated his alibi witnesses. We agree with Cleland's assessment that Kenzu's bad actions there essentially took all credibility away from his alibi witnesses. Kevin will now read more of what the judge had to say. Rebuttal evidence of airfield availability was offered not as a foundation of the prosecution's theory, but to demonstrate that even if

[00:45:12] the alibi witnesses were assumed to be correct, the abstract possibility nonetheless existed that for a few hundred dollars a small airplane could fly from Escanaba to the vicinity of Port Huron in mere hours. Petitioner now calls this theory bizarre. I did not think it a particularly important point for trial, even though it was the petitioner himself who first claimed that he might easily have arranged such a flight.

[00:45:42] That possibility was investigated but remained unlikely and I did not include it for the court to read to the jury in the prosecution's theory of the case. It merited such little comment that it was mentioned in only two or three sentences during a lengthy closing argument. I think this section of Judge Cleland's letter is critical. Over the years, Team Kenzu has vastly overstated the importance of the possibility that Kenzu chartered a plane to make his trip from Escanaba

[00:46:11] to Port Huron on the day of the murder. You have just heard the man who prosecuted the case say he feels the plane theory was unlikely. It was never an important part of the case and you do not have to believe Kenzu took a plane to believe he killed Scott Macklem. Let's return to Kevin reading from Cleland's letter. In Kenzu's November 13th call to Crystal, overheard by an investigator, the petitioner made several memorable statements including harshly mocking Crystal

[00:46:41] and her deceased fiancé, whom he referred to as having been whacked or offed. He said that he had, quote, taken care of the problem Crystal had given him and that the police will, quote, never find either the murder weapon or the car observed driving away from the scene. In an incredible display of aggression and arrogance, the petitioner expressed upset to be told that the murder had not made the television news and demanded that Crystal describe

[00:47:10] how much damage had been done to her deceased fiancé's body. He pointedly asked whether Macklem had been shot in the back or their ribcage. The autopsy proved that the shot had, in fact, struck the decedent in the ribcage and from behind, but there was nothing known to use that would have made that information available to the petitioner. The petitioner should not have had such specific knowledge.

[00:47:39] That he spoke of these details was strongly suggestive that he had been present at the scene of the crime. In addition, the petitioner was identified by others in varying degrees of certainty. The jury heard as being at the scene. All things considered, the jury had an entirely sound basis to conclude that the petitioner was there. Also, there was clear testimony that the petitioner attempted to concoct a false

[00:48:09] alibi, and there were indications that his alibi witnesses could well have been confused, perhaps coached by the petitioner as to the details. Judge Cleland concludes his letter by alluding to some of the theories that Kenzu has put forth over the years. We will talk more about those theories later. But in essence, Kenzu maintains that he is only in prison because virtually everyone in the justice system is somehow in on a conspiracy. Let's have Kevin

[00:48:38] read some more of Judge Cleland's letter. The supposed conspiracy of law enforcement officials hatched in St. Clair County to convict a man for a murder he did not commit is absolutely astounding in its illegality, breadth, and complexity. The conspiracy was designed, the petitioner imagines, to somehow protect the image of Gary Macklem, the father of the victim, and mayor of a small town in an adjacent county. In this regard, the petitioner

[00:49:08] asserts that the Port Huron Police Department and its detectives were corrupt, that I was corrupt, that my assistant prosecutors, my successor prosecutors, and their assistants were corrupt, that both the presiding judge and his successor were corrupt, that the petitioner's own attorney was corrupt, that the decedent's fiance was corrupt, all the principal witnesses were corrupt, except of course for Joplin, the jailhouse witness who was corrupt when he first testified but was not corrupt when he recanted years later. The victim

[00:49:37] was corrupt, even the victim's father was corrupt. In my view, overwrought conspiracy theory claims such as those offered in this application lack any credibility or substance. The petitioner presents to this board claims that are preposterous and meritless. When the board subtracts the myriad falsehoods from the petitioner's equation, this truth remains. There was substantial evidence of the petitioner's motivation and guilt. He presented

[00:50:07] alibi witnesses ranging from good to questionable, but the jury did not credit them sufficiently to identify a reasonable doubt. We agree with Judge Cleland's assessment. After she read his letter, Judge Armstrong concluded her presentation. So we're taking these witnesses in the order that they spoke at the hearing, and we're about to hear from the first of ultimately several women who would talk about their own experiences with Temujin Kenzu. We are sharing their

[00:50:37] stories with you today for several reasons. First of all, quite simply, these women have the right to be heard. They had the courage to come to this hearing where they knew Kenzu would be in the room, and they told the world exactly what he had done to them. That took bravery. And by sharing their stories, we honor that. There are also a couple of more practical reasons why we do it. Temujin Kenzu has often stated that Crystal lied on the stand about the abuse she suffered at the hands of Kenzu.

[00:51:06] They've attacked her on that front repeatedly. Kenzu himself has attacked her publicly on his Facebook page as recently as this year. We should stress that we absolutely believe that Crystal told the truth on the stand. But if Team Kenzu wants to make Crystal's credibility an issue in this case, then it becomes absolutely crucial to hear from other women who also had the misfortune to become involved with this man.

[00:51:35] We need to learn from them what their experiences were like. If their time with Kenzu was as filled with abuse and threats as his time with Crystal was, then it lends credibility to what she had to say. So Team Kenzu's attacks on Crystal make it absolutely essential that we hear what these other women have to say about the man. There is a final practical reason. The prosecution argued that they presented the testimony from Crystal

[00:52:04] because they felt it explained what Kenzu's motive for the murder was. Team Kenzu claims otherwise, but the prosecution only did it to make him look bad. We feel that point is now quite easily refuted if all the prosecution wanted to do was make Kenzu look bad. They had a host of other witnesses they easily could have presented. So let's start hearing from them now. The first one we will hear from is a woman named Deanna and Anya will read her words. Temujin called me,

[00:52:35] told me that he heard that I was engaged to get married. Oh, I'm sorry. He said that he needed to see me and talk to me before I was to get married. That he was always looking after me. He wanted to make sure that I was making the right decision. How could it hurt to see an old friend that I just cared about me, he said. Well, it didn't sound like it would hurt me at the time, so I made a very bad decision to meet with him.

[00:53:04] That was where my very young life made a 180 degree term. Being so young and naive, thinking I knew everything about everything at that age. I had no idea how manipulative and controlling this person was. Also, how dangerous he was or is. We want to step back from Deanna's words there for just a second to highlight what I think is a rather important point. He reached out to her because he heard she was engaged. We also know that he learned Crystal was engaged

[00:53:34] to Scott shortly before the has become engaged to another man a trigger for Temujin Kinsu. Let's return to Anya reading Deanna's words. I met with Temujin. He tells me how much he loves me. He tells me to move in with him. I didn't go home until the next day and I got my stuff and I went to the bank and withdrew all my money so I could get a place for us to live.

[00:54:04] Everything was so great. We found a place in Flint to stay. He went to get his stuff by himself and came back with Shelly who which is Michelle. Temujin said that she had nowhere to go and that was that. Well I

[00:54:35] said to me but I never encountered anybody so evil and frightening in my life to this day. To this day I'm 19 years old and he tells me he's going to kill me and chop me up in little pieces and throw me in the river and my parents will find me. Just pausing briefly to note another pattern. As soon as someone does something Kinsu does not like he goes ballistic becoming violent. We know that some who have covered this case portray Kinsu as a charming and

[00:55:05] wonderful fellow. I saw one article where the reporter actually gushed over Kinsu's love of puppies. Hopefully they understand that they would see another side of him if they disagreed with him on a subject and they only seeing the side of him that is so charming because they agree with him I know that if I wouldn't have listened to him I would have been dead or someone I love would have been dead.

[00:55:35] He did threaten to kill Robin that was my fiance that I was engaged to prior if I went back with him as he did Scott if Crystal went back to him and now Scott's dead. He made me quit college so no one could find me he had people watching me at all times so I couldn't leave he had many people according to him that worked for him and did things for him like he had a secret ring of people or cult this again is worth noting many people claim to find

[00:56:05] it hard to believe when Crystal spoke of Kinzu telling her being part of a mysterious organization but here is Deanna saying that she heard the exact same thing from Kinzu it is yet another item that bolsters Crystal's credibility she was clearly telling the truth I think it is also worth highlighting that Kinzu's talk of a cult seems to be a recurrent theme in his life even beyond

[00:56:35] his life it almost seems as if Kinzu was aspiring to be another Charles Manson type this all brings up another thing about Kinzu that doesn't seem to have been mentioned before he wrote a book in 2016 Temujin Kinzu released a volume called The Sacred

[00:57:05] is described on Amazon Kinzu is described there as a gifted genius who has the title of Omi Semyon or Reverend Father he is offering a new religion his words are said to offer the key to redemption deliverance and salvation we are also told that peace and joy for the followers can set a new path for a troubled world this is clearly cult stuff which reveals

[00:57:34] much about Temujin Kinzu's over inflated sense of self hopefully this is an area of Kinzu's existence which can be further explored but for now let's return to Anya reading Deanna's words he beat me up several times I

[00:58:09] women women women women not the only victims of Kinzu's violence pets were also in the line of fire again here is Deanna and we're not entirely sure who the John in this story is there was an argument between Temujin and John according to Temujin John wasn't in the apartment when this happened John was not there but Temujin was kicking choking punching

[00:58:39] John's cat because he's mad at John I mean it was gross he'd pick the cat up and throw it up in the air and punch it I thought it was disgusting we agree one thing that Team Kinzu has tried to make mysterious is what exactly the source of his money was he was not working so the argument goes that even if he wanted to he simply did not have the financial resources to do something like hire a plane but leaving the

[00:59:08] plane argument aside it is important to note that a major source of funds for Temujin Kinzu was the women that Temujin had a bank account in another name that I was to deposit my money into for him and his people I'm not positive on the name of the account if I didn't it would be trouble with him and his people I didn't want that because I didn't know what he

[00:59:38] would do I made him a lot of money that could pay for a charter plane easily and who knows how and followed through with his threats it was at around this point that one of the board members interrupted Deanna's story to directly address Temujin Kinzu Anya will read the words of the board members and Kevin that's me of course will

[01:00:08] read what Kinzu said sir throughout her testimony you've been doing some things that yourself these witnesses are coming forward to give material to this board I need you to respect their right to provide that testimony so please either look forward or look down and refrain from making any movements or gestures that could be interpreted as intimidating or disrespectful

[01:00:38] for the record may I interject you know it's one thing to ask for a piece of paper and a pen but to look at people and to make faces clearly because you think or don't trust the credibility is something that is not conducive to due process it is something that you had every right to do in the chair and do so these witnesses I find it offensive that you would say after I have been looking at you for the last 10 minutes that you have not in any way shape or form been animated and turned to

[01:01:08] witnesses I right to say it so even when his own freedom was on the line kinsu could not stop himself from trying to

[01:01:38] intimidate and scare the women he terrorized it was bad enough that the board literally had to place an armed guard next to him that tells us so much about this man and it also highlights another point we only know about kinsu's offensive behavior at the hearing because a board member made a point to halt proceedings and read it into the record so much of what happens at a legal proceeding just does not get reflected in the written record this is one of the reasons

[01:02:07] why judges and courts give so much deference to the trial jury it is the jury who is actually there it is the jury who gets to see and hear the witnesses and see and hear the accused man some of the things they pick up on just may not be in the written record so again we stress the jury in Kenziew's case explicitly rejected the testimony of the alibi witnesses and they had good reason to do so let's return to Anya reading Deanna's words I didn't come back to Michigan until

[01:02:37] Temujin was convicted for murder the murder of Scott one of the other people that he had threatened is now dead I thought it would be safe to come home I

[01:03:08] so he had to appeal his case and found me at work and knows where I live in the year of 1998 he had called me at work on a three way call he said that he had known of my whereabouts for years that he had private investigators following me for years once again I was in fear of my life because I didn't know what he could do to me even behind prison he had someone physically standing in front of me even when he was in prison so even from behind bars this man

[01:03:38] this Temujin Kenzu he reaches out and he terrorizes people he hired people to follow Deanna to report back what on earth will he do to these people if god forbid the state of Michigan would ever be stupid enough to free him and we would like to underscore another thing that we

[01:04:27] manipulates them sometimes even love bombing them he frightens them with threats and violence he isolates these women from their loved ones he threatens and in some cases harms men who he views as romantic and sexual rivals or even family members who might get in the way and even when he's incarcerated he uses other people to get to them when he can't even behind bars this person continues to threaten look at what he and his wife Paula have done to Crystal over the years

[01:04:57] they wage a phony but very successful media campaign to clean up his image and portray himself as the world's biggest victim Kenzu is not an impulsive offender he is as calculated as it gets he's got a script and he's stuck to it for years in order to dominate and harm his victims Scott's murder was Now we've talked quite a bit today about domestic violence and

[01:05:26] our focus has been on how it affects the person who is the target of that violence but let's be honest the people who love the person who is being abused are also deeply affected by the horror with that in mind let's listen to the next person who offered a statement this is Deanna's mother Dolores Anya will read her words Temujin had made a statement that he's not a rapist well my daughter and I were talking last night and she has never really told me much

[01:05:56] about what went on between when she left home until today last night as a matter of fact her husband had told me Saturday night that Temujin had raped my daughter when she was like 18 years old and that was at the time when she left our home and he also threatened her at that time this is what my daughter told me threatened her at that time that he would kill her chop her up and

[01:06:37] we move forward a bit in her comments to a point where she is discussing a stressful event for her family again Anya will read her words my husband and I at that time now deceased put out a missing report on our daughter because she had been missing for over 48 hours and we had no idea where she was at and we took it upon ourselves to try to locate her Timogen found out that we were searching for her and he called our house several times sometimes more than once a

[01:07:07] day threatened us that if we continued to try to locate Deanna he would kill her cut her up put her in small boxes and mail her home to our home murder my family and our family dog I have two other children and that made them extremely frightened of him at the time they were 13 and 14 these threats were on a daily basis for several months

[01:07:36] we believe the story that Dolores tells reminds us quite a thing many people do not realize is that Kenzu has continued to terrorize and harass people especially women even while he has been behind bars Dolores will tell us about that and again Ani is going to read her words

[01:08:06] sometime after he was in prison somewhere between the 80s or 90s I don't quite remember the exact date Temujin called me from prison to have Deanna contact him and at that time that is when an unlisted line was worth something nobody could get it I don't know how he found out my number I don't know how he found out where

[01:08:47] I had vicious man there is no reason for him to be released I did hang up the phone at that time I lived alone and there was nobody there but myself I got up and fell to my knees because I

[01:09:23] in raging that Kenzo subjected Dolores to that sort of treatment even when he himself was behind bars over and above that we think it is important to point out something else in her trial testimony Crystal talked about Kenzo seeming to have all sorts of information about her private life about things that happened in her house things he should have no way of knowing what Dolores said reminded us of that Kenzo managed to get her private number and information about her house

[01:09:52] how did he how on earth would he have known Scott would be in class that day or where he would park his car but again Kenzo was really good at stalking people that means

[01:10:22] he is good at finding out information about people's personal and private habits that he can then use to his advantage if you or I cannot immediately figure out how he did it all it means is that we are not next person who spoke to the board this was Patricia Macklem Scott Macklem's mother let's hear what she had to say Anya will read her words

[01:10:52] Mr. Kenzo began stalking Scott in the fall of 1986 Scott was attending St. Claire County Community College and working at George Ennis menswear store in Port Huron Michigan Scott came home several times and said that the guy who victimized Crystal was coming into the men's store and would just stand across the counter or a rack of clothes until he got his attention stare at

[01:11:32] Scott would come home and tell me of these events and was very frightened I talked to the police at that time and was told that since he there was no contact just stalking that there was very little that we could do to prevent it now we know that this was his preparation for the murder he carried out on Scott however in a quote from a letter written by Temujin Kenzu we received in June of 1988 he states which you I never met your son I

[01:12:02] never saw or I never met your son he never saw or met me this is a total lie he stalked him until he knew exactly what Scott looked like another quote from his letter how could I wait that morning for a another quote maybe you know the reason for Scott's absences from morning classes again how would Mr. Kenzu

[01:12:31] know this type of information well we believe Kenzu knew that type of information because he was stalking Scott and we believe that is how Temujin Kenzu knew to be in the parking lot that morning to commit the murder now there is plenty more to cover from the commutation hearing including statements from Temujin Kenzu daughter and his former wife we will get to all of that in our next episode on the case which we will release next

[01:13:32] time on a takes option on to tip us a bit of money for records requests you can do so at www buy me a coffee dot com slash murder sheet we very much appreciate any support Special thanks to Kevin Tyler Greenlee, who composed the music for The Murder Sheet, and who you can find on the web at kevintg.com.

[01:13:59] If you're looking to talk with other listeners about a case we've covered, you can join The Murder Sheet discussion group on Facebook. We mostly focus our time on research and reporting, so we're not on social media much. We do try to check our email account, but we ask for patience as we often receive a lot of messages. Thanks again for listening.